Dubai court acquits European woman in a fraud case, convicts three others
The Dubai Criminal Court cleared a European woman of charges related to a money transfer case arising from a fake rental advertisement on social media.However, three other individuals were convicted for their involvement in the same incident, as the court found insufficient evidence against the woman but established the guilt of the other defendants.The case originated from a complaint by a man who reported falling victim to fraud after engaging with an online advertisement for an apartment rental.He had agreed to rent the apartment for two months at a specified fee.The perpetrators directed the victim to transfer the payments in installments to various bank accounts and provided documents, including a lease agreement copy, via social media to make the offer appear authentic.The case papers indicate that the victim transferred money to two separate accounts held by the defendants.However, once the transfers were finalised, all communication stopped, leading the victim to discover that the advertised apartment was fictitious and the listing fraudulent. This prompted the victim to file an official complaint.During the trial, the court examined the financial records of the transactions.The evidence showed that funds transferred to the first defendant's account were quickly redirected to the account of a second defendant. The second defendant then further transferred the money to an account belonging to a third individual, who was ultimately acquitted.The court expalined in its reasoning that the offense of obtaining money while believing its origin to be unlawful does not necessitate evidence of involvement in the initial fraudulent act.It is sufficient to demonstrate that the accused acquired or handled the funds with knowledge or belief of their illicit source, which can be deduced from the case's circumstances.Additionally, the court determined that the swift movement of funds across multiple accounts and the lack of a valid explanation for these transactions provided adequate proof of criminal intent on the part of the convicted individuals, thereby justifying their conviction and sentencing.On the other hand, the court distinguished between the roles of the defendants and found no compelling evidence to convict the female defendant, leading to her acquittal, even though part of the money was traced to her account.The court underscored that criminal convictions must rest on certainty and firm belief rather than speculation or possibility, affirming that any uncertainty should be resolved in favor of the accused.
The Dubai Criminal Court cleared a European woman of charges related to a money transfer case arising from a fake rental advertisement on social media.However, three other individuals were convicted for their involvement in the same incident, as the court found insufficient evidence against the woman but established the guilt of the other defendants.The case originated from a complaint by a man who reported falling victim to fraud after engaging with an online advertisement for an apartment rental.He had agreed to rent the apartment for two months at a specified fee.The perpetrators directed the victim to transfer the payments in installments to various bank accounts and provided documents, including a lease agreement copy, via social media to make the offer appear authentic.The case papers indicate that the victim transferred money to two separate accounts held by the defendants.However, once the transfers were finalised, all communication stopped, leading the victim to discover that the advertised apartment was fictitious and the listing fraudulent. This prompted the victim to file an official complaint.During the trial, the court examined the financial records of the transactions.The evidence showed that funds transferred to the first defendant's account were quickly redirected to the account of a second defendant. The second defendant then further transferred the money to an account belonging to a third individual, who was ultimately acquitted.The court expalined in its reasoning that the offense of obtaining money while believing its origin to be unlawful does not necessitate evidence of involvement in the initial fraudulent act.It is sufficient to demonstrate that the accused acquired or handled the funds with knowledge or belief of their illicit source, which can be deduced from the case's circumstances.Additionally, the court determined that the swift movement of funds across multiple accounts and the lack of a valid explanation for these transactions provided adequate proof of criminal intent on the part of the convicted individuals, thereby justifying their conviction and sentencing.On the other hand, the court distinguished between the roles of the defendants and found no compelling evidence to convict the female defendant, leading to her acquittal, even though part of the money was traced to her account.The court underscored that criminal convictions must rest on certainty and firm belief rather than speculation or possibility, affirming that any uncertainty should be resolved in favor of the accused.
What's Your Reaction?
Economist Admin
Admin managing news updates, RSS feed curation, and PR content publishing. Focused on timely, accurate, and impactful information delivery.
